Tuesday, May 12, 2009

Vague or Specific Brands?

Within the spectrum of brand definitions, there are two extremes: vague brands and specific brands. Before we look at the implications of each, let's define them.

Specific brand: A brand that defines itself narrowly and with detail. Examples include Starbucks, Ray-Ban, and Kleenex.

Vague brand: A brand that defines itself via characteristics, emotions, and broad strokes. Examples include IBM (the new IBM), National Geographic, and Disney.

The differences between these types of brands go beyond names and logos. A specific brand is limited in its ability to spread beyond a limited category. Ray-Ban, for example, is exclusively sunglasses. Customers would not eat at the Ray-Ban Restaurant or buy Ray-Ban shoes. A vague brand is the opposite--a brand that can transcend categories and work across many channels. National Geographic has a television channel, a magazine, guided tours, retails shops, and many other conduits for its brand.

Each also has benefits and drawbacks. A specific brand is much simpler to establish and manage. Since it is highly focused, the messages and all other elements are easier to control within a narrow category. The drawback is that the brand is limited in terms of expansion. It becomes very difficult to spread a narrow brand.

When dealing with a vague brand, there is a huge amount of potential and variety. Like with Disney, a strong vague brand can extend from hotels to consumer products to consulting. The drawbacks here involve intense monitoring and management of the brand. A wide variety of goods and services means managing multiple messages, approaches, and styles that all have to fall under one overall brand umbrella. The cost of this management is much higher than a specific brand, but so is the potential.

As you develop your brand, try to think into the future to where you want to take it. I am not suggesting that you start off with a hard-to-control vague brand, but with proper planning, your move to a broader brand will be much simpler than if you try to do so with a specific brand.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

Branding Help for the Retail Sector

I don't believe that this will come over as overly snarky, however I do believe that these kind of common sense ideas will make everyone's retail experience better. If you own a retail store or chain, it will make your retail brand experience stronger, richer and more rewarding.

On another note, I don't think these ideas are too "boutiquey" for big box retail, in fact big box retail might want to read this post twice.

Attitude: Make sure you don't have one that offends. I'd rather see a big smile than to made to feel like I'm thankful for being able to shop in the staff's presence...

Good Music: Not Muzak. Not what my dad calls hippedy-hop. Renovation Hardware does a great job of this with their music, as does Victoria's Secret. What I recommend is something that reflects the brand and invites a variety of customers, not just your selected profile, to stay longer, enjoy your store, and not get bored. One never knows when your mom may want to buy the latest sneakers and may even buy several pairs if she enjoys the store environment, music included. There are always songs from each genre that have a wider appeal--it just takes a little bit of research.

Nice Packaging:
A well done shopping bag is one of the best tools you can employ in the retail environment. You have the opportunity for each customer to walk around displaying your logo, so you may as well put it on a great-looking bag. Even better, on the higher end, when tissue paper and a box is included in the packaging, it looks great! Yes, it costs 4 cents per purchase and yes, it is remembered by everyone who ever sees your packaging. You want to make more from customers? this is a great way to start.

Attention to detail.
I don't really need to explain, do I?

Last, Service minded, smartly dressed, and appropriately enthusiastic staff: Work on this aspect of your brand until you can't get any better, then make sure it stays that way. Your customer service representatives are your brand embassadors. They convey the experience of your brand, and what is discussed by your customers after they leave. How often do they talk about your logo or your lighting? Not very often. Thus, this aspect of your brand experience deserves considerable attention.

If you can get these five things right, it will lead the way for even more branding details to fall right into place.

Labels: ,

Friday, May 1, 2009

Branding the Current Economy


I have noticed that the news has had a tough time branding our economy these days. Maybe that is because names like "The Great Depression" and "The .com Crash" are created after these events, rather than during. Well unfortunately, this economic climate may be lasting longer than the others, and will need a name and personality.

Here are a few names I have heard recently:
  1. new economy
  2. economic downturn
  3. Obamanomics (cousin to Reaganomics?)
  4. recession
  5. good depression
  6. Obama recession
  7. or as seen in The New York Times: The Slumdog Recession/Depression!
My favorite so far is The Good Depression. This name was invented by a friend of mine in the nonprofit sector. She says that this depression is not depressing, though many would disagree with her! She says that in this age of self awareness, we are open to all possibilities, including financial adventures! For nonprofits it is an opportunity to clean house and become more efficient and effective. Needless to say, a few corporations have seized this opportunity already. This HR "cleaning house" is a "survival of the fittest" per se. What works for nature is being put into place in the workforce.

Meanwhile, the term "Good Depression" can be applied at home: we are rediscovering the cost-effective, simple pleasures of eating home-cooked meals together, and vacationing locally; we are rediscovering our sense of creativity in gift-giving; we are entertaining ourselves in less expensive, technology driven, and expensive ways. For most families in dire need of connecting with each other, this is a good thing.

Applying the term 'Good Depression' to our personal or corporate finances can be a bit tricky--especially for those of us who have recently lost money in our investments. As you may have suspected, my friend has an explanation for this too. She says that this Depression, though presently among our finances with often disastrous results, has flushed out a bevy of dishonest and financially irresponsible individuals--again a good thing.

You may know already that a name is not a brand. Perhaps this depression will need to live into its name, as do many children with names like "Grace" "Theodore" or "Spartacus." Let's see what the future brings.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Branding Readability


To many, the visual aspects of a brand--a brand identity, or style--is what is thought of when the word brand is mentioned. With this in mind, it is interesting how often designers create identities that are unreadable. Now, I don't mean that the brand is unreadable due to poor grammar! Rather, this is due to strictly visual reasons, the sort that designers should be aware of as professionals. It is amazing how often this happens. Let's visit a few reasons identities are unreadable:

1. Font. There is a reason why Helvetica is probably the most used typeface--it is easily read. It can be reduced to a teeny tiny size and is still readable. Some of us are sick of Helvetica, and seek alternatives, and get into trouble. It is important to select a font that is truly readable at a distance. Ask someone that wears glasses to try to read it--is it overly difficult for them at a large size? Sometimes, designers argue: "This design isn't for older people anyway!" I wonder what those older people do when they can't read the packaging on a gift they want to buy for their neice or grand-daughter?...they have the onerous task of delaying their purchase due to their inability to read the text. How is that a good introduction to that product and brand? It is not good, yet remains in the hands of designers making type decisions.

2. Color. Some colors are difficult to read at any size. Try yellow or some shades of orange. for example. Light blue falls in this category too. The background color complicates matters. There is nothing like red text on a blue background--a visually vibrating mess of a combination.

The essential thing to remember with color is to make selections that are appropriate for the size and background where it appears. The best way to check is to print out a copy--on your computer monitor, it will probably be more defined and easier to read.

3. Location. Sometimes the items identifying a brand are located in a strange place or on a complicated pattern making it unreadable because the reader can't find it! Use conventional places to use text in packaging, among other design peices. There are other opportunities for creativity. If you are using photographs, illustrations, or patterned backgrounds, thoroughly test your design to make sure the text is easily read.

Labels: ,

Monday, April 27, 2009

Cafe Bustello's Hipster Gamble


In the New York Times this Sunday is an article on Cafe Bustello coffee. This brand’s approach to growth is interesting in that they are approaching a non-traditional market base. Cafe Bustello is experiencing a growth spurt, with many good reasons for this growth. Cafe Bustello is quickly becoming a "Hipster Brand”--meaning that it is being marketed to the affluent and style leaders of the Millennial Generation. We have seen this before from a number of brands: Carthart Clothing, Pabst Blue Ribbon Beer and Hush Puppies to name a few.

Hush Puppies went through a short period of similar growth. This is just enough to bamboozle your marketing and sales projections before the next idea (or fad) is claimed by another company!

The biggest problem for brand growth due to a “hip factor” is that it usually does not match nor extend the core customer base. It begs questions: Do I chase the new audience and hope it stays with the brand long enough to add to the current core customers?...Do I spend money for ads intended to enhance the brand for these new customers, knowing that the current customer base will probably not see these ads or be influenced by them? These are tough decisions, but in Cafe Bustello's case they can't really do either…because a large part of the new target is really the children of the current core customer base!

Advantages for Cafe Bustello's brand are:
  • A loved Cuban/American Brand
  • Available in stores in the urban centers of the Cuban community
  • Reasonably priced
  • Unique taste
  • At the moment, Cuban coffee is a fresher story than Columbian coffee)
  • Notoriously under-marketed to the mainstream.

Disadvantages of the brand include:
  • Approaching a new audience that is notoriously fickle
  • If marketed as a premium product at a new price point, this will quickly alienate the current core
  • A lack of funds and market share to compete against the global players in the international and U.S. market
  • As a result, Cafe Bustello may be left with an alienated core customer base.

Cafe Bustello is taking a smart approach to this particular dilemma by segmenting their audience into two groups. They are introducing new products that come prepackaged (not unlike the Starbucks "Mocha" and "Doubleshot" products") and are only marketing these towards the youth market. The original coffee is being marketed in the traditional way but with a bit of a youthful twist. This keeps the current customer base and also reaches deeper in the Cuban community with a focus on community music and artists. Hopefully this grow their brand awareness and lead to enhanced sales.

The hipsters don’t always drink what grandma drank! Thus, this approach strikes a strong mix with the senior customer base, yet potentially may gain a massive, new, affluent young base. This will be a brand worth watching.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

Showering Skies

One of the best ways to make your brand work is to harness what are called key differentiators from your competitors. If you are successful at this, customers will choose your products or services because your company provides something the others do not. In addition, these differences may be geared towards specific groups of people, called target markets.

A new company that is doing the differentiation dance well these days is Emirates, one of the fastest growing airlines in the world. Unlike other airlines, it has been profitable for over 20 years! If you are an investor, that is indeed a difference from airlines here in the States. Another difference is the level of luxury provided to first class guests: cabins like mini hotel rooms, complete with showers.

Labels: ,

Overgreening

“We’re going green!” is less fresh and new these days. When it comes to branding, the green bandwagon is a full one. What does it mean to have a green brand?... To be in the green industry?...Or just form a few good green habits?

Most companies who say they are now a green brand are really forming new greener habits. They are choosing different paper sources, recycling, telecommuting, and so forth. It is not the crux of how they do business. It is not a filter with which they interview staff or determine buying decisions. It is not the essence of what is communicated in how they do business. Therefore, it is a collection of habits, rather than a brand. Companies that tend to fall in this category are said to be doing “greenwashing” according to Patricia Faulhaber who recently contributed to PRSA’s Public Relations Tactics. “More than one CEO was challenged during last year’s proxy season by investors who questioned green expenditures…” writes Bruce Harrison, elsewhere in the same publication.

Companies that are large have no trouble showing profits in this economy are at the forefront of green initiatives…again, NOT a green brand, but a green initiative. GE is so comfortable with its new innovation branch, Ecomagination, that it was proud of TV’s 30 Rock with dialog: “I’m so excited to see this trash-powered car of yours!” says Gore, to which Alec Baldwin responds “The thing is that the GE garbage car isn’t quite ready yet. Whaddaya say you throw on a pair of green tights and a cape and tell the kids how big business is good for the environment?” (Fast Company, March, 2009). Another front player with green initiatives, surprisingly enough, is Walmart. Their claims to fame include a store that was able to recycle 70% of its trash, setting itself as a potential leader in this arena for Walmart; as well as architectural elements reducing typical energy consumption. Yet, leadership for Walmart (accurately in my opinion) reports “We’re not green” (Fast Company, March, 2009).

Meanwhile, the green industry is growing, and has been selected as a trend to watch in the December, 2008 issue of Entrepreneur. Examples of companies in the green arena include Terracycle, a green business that recycles trash into fertilizer, and Pelamis Wave Power, an energy company harnessing the power of the sea. Their product lines include products that are green, but is their brand green? Not necessarily, and also, not easily! A segment of 60 Minutes on TV last autumn reported the unfortunate procedures of Denver-area recyclers of computer products—shipped right into a water supply in a foreign country. With this recent news in our memories, the companies that sell green products and services have their work cut out for them if they want their brand to be truly green.

To brand an organization successfully as green, this idea needs to be pervasive in all aspects of the organization. For example, it is a key element that is communicated visually, written about in it’s annual report and marketing materials, is included in training of staff, is conveyed to vendors, is part of how they select business methods and systems, facilities, transportation, and overall management of the company. It is everywhere. It is communicated by staff when they talk to their friends at parties on the weekend. It is something that isn’t dreamed up yesterday. It is clearly seen by customers, and is part of why their customers select them. As with all branding, it is deep, ingrained, and lasts. A great example of how this works comes from David Byrne, well known for his worldly ways. He has traveled by bicycle for decades and explains “I take a bicycle with me on tour. I don’t ride to make a point or to lower my carbon footprint—I ride because it feels good and it gets me where I want to go”(Destination, April, 2009).

Labels: , , ,

Monday, April 13, 2009

Adding to Your Brand

We've talked at length about establishing a brand, defining a brand, and all sorts of different ways to work with and leverage a brand. But what if you need to add to it? Incorporating a new element into your brand can be a real challenge, especially if this element is something that is also entirely new to your organization.

McDonald's is working with this adjustment right now. The chain known for convenience, value, and consistency is now looking to build its "green" credentials and hopefully build this into its brand--not just for use as a PR tactic. The challenge here is twofold:
  1. Can McDonald's actually make a big enough splash with green activities that their efforts will actually mean something?
  2. If #1 is accomplished, can this be integrated successfully into the McDonald's brand?

Since this is something fairly new for the company, McDonald's needs to find a way to properly integrate its green initiatives into its communications. Much like any other group adding a new brand element, careful planning will occur, the new element will be installed across the organization's internal business processes, and finally, integrated little by little into external communications (ads, packaging, promotions, etc.).

One of the largest hurdles to overcome during this process is the check to make sure this new elements gels with the existing brand. If it does not, there is a bigger problem: why are you adding this in the first place if it doesn't make sense for the organization? Without passing this check, you'll end up shoehorning an incompatible element into your brand and sew the seeds of instability and inconsistency.

Source: Warner, Melanie. Large Fry. Fast Company, April, 2009.

Labels: , ,