Battle of the Brands

Whether you, your child, or your friends play video games (or not), it's probably safe to assume you've heard about the music-simulation phenomenon that has swept the electronic entertainment sector and become the big blockbuster sellers at the holidays. It began with Guitar Hero (with a single guitar), which led to a sequel, which led to Rock Band (the 4-instrument simluation), which all culminated in 2008's Guitar Hero World Tour (4th installment) and Rock Band 2--both full 4-instrument simulations.
Now that you know the history, let's talk about the product. At this point, the Rock Band and Guitar Hero franchises have become nearly identical products. They each feature singing, lead guitar, bass guitar, and drums. The mechanics of how one plays are nearly identical. Even the song lists, at this point, have a lot of crossover. Granted, there are some superficial differences including Guitar Hero's "GH Tunes" feature, but for the most part, we're talking about Coke vs. Pepsi (if you're wondering, the price points are about the same too).
Consider this, now: NPD's 2008 figures show that the recent Guitar Hero offering outsold Rock Band 2 by a factor of 2:1 (1.7 million vs. 3.4 million units). With all other factors equalized, it is Guitar Hero's strength of branding that has propelled it to the number 1 position. The franchise has existed longer, has bigger and stronger partnerships (for example, its use of celebrities), and a huge and dedicated community.
As a shining example of how branding can make the difference with comparable competition, this instance has some takeaways we can all use against our competition. In this case, volume of advertising, superiority of product, merchandizing, and pricing do not factor into the upper hand. Rather, we see a strong leverage of external forces, consistent messaging across media and partners, and everlasting reinforcement of the core brand promise. Relentlessly pursuing this strategy has paid off in the face of competition. A good lesson for us all.
Labels: best practices, Branding commentary, corporate branding


